Jump to content

Talk:Epilepsy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleEpilepsy has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 14, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
January 26, 2014Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1530917/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ⸺RandomStaplers 03:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision summary

[edit]

Over the past few days, I have made substantial revisions to the Epilepsy article with the goal of improving clarity, accuracy, and structure. The rewrite was approached section by section, emphasizing evidence-based medicine, recent international guidelines (e.g. ILAE, NICE, Cochrane), and encyclopedic tone accessible to general readers. After editing the sections, I conducted a checked for cohesion across the article. Sections that remain unchanged are History and Contraception and pregnancy. All feedback is welcome. Thank you!

Pwoli (talk) 20:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]